🎀 Storyboard β€” "Autonoma Agenter – vad Γ€r det och vΓ₯gar vi?" (7 Shades edition)

Speaker script Β· demo plan Β· 7 Levels framework Β· prep checklist

Mode: ↑ Sorter ↓ Full script

Act 1 β€” The Framework Β· 7 min

1
Autonoma Agenter

– vad Γ€r det och vΓ₯gar vi?

Johan Wallquist Β· PSA Β· Microsoft

153060
2
The 7 Levels
  • L1-3: Ask β†’ Draft β†’ In-tool
  • L4: Agent plans & executes
  • L5: Team of specialists
  • L6: Autonomous ops
  • L7: Dark Factory
153060
3
Audience Poll

Where are YOU? Where is your ORG? Where are the coolest startups?

πŸ–οΈ Hold up fingers 1-7

153060

Act 2 β€” The Proof Β· 8 min

4
πŸ”΄ Live Demo

We could talk about agents. I'd rather talk to them.

153060
5
The Reveal

Two weeks later β€” a live site. 10 categories. Agents run overnight.

Built by one person. Who can't code.
153060
6
Dark Factory

Level 7 β€” fully autonomous software. We're not there yet. But look how close.

3060

Act 3 β€” The Shift Β· 5 min

7
The Shift
  • Reasoning across tasks
  • Tool use β€” MCP, skills
  • Self-correction loops

πŸ§ β†’πŸ“‹β†’πŸ”§β†’βœ…β†’πŸ”„

153060
8
Building Blocks

πŸ’¬ Copilot β†’ πŸ”Œ + Tools β†’ πŸ‘₯ + Team

3060

Act 4 β€” VΓ₯gar Vi? Β· 9 min

9
By the Numbers

2 evenings Β· 8 agents Β· 14 sources Β· 75+ entries Β· ~15 min/day Β· 1 non-dev

3060
10
VΓ₯gar Vi?

πŸ”₯ Day Three β€” agent "improved" entries. Site broke.

Agent confidence β‰  correctness

153060
11
Trust Spectrum

πŸ”’ Check Everything ↔ βœ… Trust but Verify ↔ ⚑ Let It Run

153060
12
Guardrails
  • πŸ”’ Security & Governance
  • πŸ€– Responsible AI
Autonomy without guardrails is chaos with better PR.
3060

Act 5 β€” The Close Β· 6 min

13
What I Learned
  • We're already there
  • Trust is earned, not assumed
  • Teams that direct agents move faster
153060
14
Your Turn

That access is here now. VΓ₯gar du?

153060
15
Resources
  • 🌐 bit.ly/agentjohan + QR
  • πŸ”§ Copilot CLI
  • πŸ‘₯ Squad
  • πŸŽ“ Free course
153060

Act 1 β€” The Framework

7 min
1/15

Autonoma Agenter
– vad Γ€r det och vΓ₯gar vi?

A Field Report on Autonomous Agents and Trust

Johan Wallquist Β· Partner Solution Architect Β· Microsoft

15 30 60 ⚑ HIGH · 1 min

Welcome. The title asks a question: autonomous agents β€” what are they, and do we dare? By the end of this session, you'll have an answer. Let's start with a framework.

2/15

The 7 Levels

of AI Partnership

L1 Ask & answer Β· L2 Draft & edit Β· L3 In-tool copilot
L4 Agent β€” plans, executes, checks
L5 Team of specialists β€” memory, roles
L6 Autonomous ops β€” humans at judgment points
L7 Dark Factory β€” fully autonomous software
15 30 60 🎯 FRAMEWORK · 4 min · Step through levels

There are seven levels of working with AI. Let me walk you through them.

These first three are familiar. You ask AI questions. It drafts for you. It works inside your tools. Most of us live here.

Level 4 is where it changes. You describe a task β€” AI plans, executes, and checks its own work. This is not autocomplete. This is an operator.

Level 5 β€” you're directing a team of specialist agents. Each with its own expertise, memory, and role. Frameworks like Microsoft Agent Framework, CrewAI, and Squad make this possible today.

Level 6 β€” agents run autonomously. They discover, triage, execute. Humans step in at the judgment points. Think autonomous DevOps, AI-powered content pipelines, self-healing systems.

Level 7 β€” the Dark Factory. Fully autonomous software that builds and operates itself. We're not there yet. But look how close we got.

Now β€” before I show you something, I want to know where you are.

3/15

Where Are You?
Where Is Your Organization?

πŸ–οΈ Hold up fingers β€” one through seven

1️⃣ Where are YOU personally?

What level describes how you work with AI today?

2️⃣ Where is your ORGANIZATION?

Not the most advanced team β€” the typical employee.

3️⃣ Where are Sweden's coolest AI startups?

Where do you think the frontier is?

15 30 60 🎯 INTERACTIVE · 2 min · Show of hands

Three questions. Hold up fingers β€” one through seven.

First: where are YOU personally? What level describes how you work with AI today?

Second: where is your ORGANIZATION? Not the most advanced team β€” the typical employee.

Third: where are Sweden's coolest AI startups? Where do you think the frontier is?

Interesting. Keep those numbers in mind. Now let me show you something.

Act 2 β€” The Proof

8 min
4/15

πŸ”΄ Live Demo

We could talk about autonomous agents.
I'd rather talk to them.

Watch: how it thinks Β· what it proposes Β· what appears in the folders

15 30 60 πŸ”΄ LIVE DEMO Β· 4-5 min Β· Voice β†’ team β†’ build β†’ pivot

We could talk about autonomous agents. I'd rather talk to them.

DO: Switch to terminal (pre-staged). Speak the prompt via voice-to-text. Three phases: team proposal β†’ approve β†’ build. Show file explorer while files appear. Pivot when ready. See demo card below.

πŸ”΄ SQUAD DEMO β€” Full Script

What the audience will see

You talk to an AI team. It thinks about what you need, proposes specialists, and when you approve β€” starts building the project. Files appear in the folders in real-time. Then you jump ahead 6 weeks to show the finished result. The contrast between the half-built scaffold and the polished production site is the wow moment.

Before the talk (pre-staging)

βœ“
Open terminal (PowerShell 7) β€” large font (20pt+), dark theme, clean prompt
βœ“
Run demosquad projectname β€” creates folder, git init, squad init, launches Agency + Copilot + Squad
βœ“
Once loaded, press Ctrl+L to clear init clutter (keeps context)
βœ“
Open file explorer next to terminal β€” showing projects\demo\projectname (snap left/right)
βœ“
Type squad as first message β€” triggers welcome greeting. Leave it waiting for input.
βœ“
Browser tab pre-loaded with aka.ms/agenticlibrary (hidden behind terminal)
βœ“
Enable voice-to-text (Windows dictation: Win+H). Test it once before the talk.
βœ“
Do a full test run tonight. Time it. Know where your pivot point is.

Phase 1 β€” The Prompt (~60 sec)

1
Narrate to audience: "I have an empty project. I'm not going to write code. I'm going to describe what I want to build β€” and let a team of AI agents figure out how."
2
Activate voice-to-text (Win+H) and speak this prompt:

🎀 The prompt (speak naturally, one phrase at a time):

"I want to build a curated content library for AI resources.
It should be a website where a community can browse and contribute links.
I want it automated.
New content should be discovered from feeds, triaged by topic, quality-checked, and published β€” with a human approving at the right moment.
Help me think this through.
What team do I need, what should the architecture look like, and what do we build first?"

Phase 2 β€” The Team Proposal (~60 sec)

3
Wait. Squad thinks and proposes team members with names and roles (10-20 sec). Stay quiet β€” let the audience read. The silence is the drama.
4
React naturally: "Look at this. It didn't just list roles β€” it designed a team. Each specialist has a name, a charter, and will remember what it learns across sessions. It's a thinking partner β€” helping me design the architecture before a single line of code exists."
5
Say or type: "This looks great. Hire them and start building the foundation."

Phase 3 β€” Watch It Build (~60-90 sec)

6
Squad creates team files β€” charters, memory files appear in .squad/agents/. Point to file explorer: "Watch the folders."
7
Squad starts building β€” project files appear: folder structure, configs, workflow definitions, agent prompts. Don't narrate every file β€” let the visual speak. Occasionally point: "There's the workflow." "There's the agent definition."
8
After 30-60 seconds of files streaming, narrate: "This is still going. It's designing the workflows, writing the prompts, setting up the automation. I could sit here and watch it finish β€” or I could let it run and review later. That's how I actually work."

Phase 4 β€” The Pivot

9
THE PIVOT LINE (rehearse this!): "I did exactly this. Six weeks ago. Same empty folder. Same conversation. I let it build, I reviewed, I iterated β€” and I kept going. Let me show you where this ends up."
10
Switch to browser. Browse the live site β€” categories, search, a link entry. "This is in production. Real users. Real agents running overnight. Built from a conversation like the one you just watched."

Fallback plan

A
If Squad is slow proposing the team (>30 sec): "It's thinking β€” designing the right team for this problem. While it works, let me show you where this conversation leadsβ€”" β†’ pivot to site early. Come back to terminal later if it finishes.
B
If Squad proposes team but stalls on building: Pivot after the team proposal. "These specialists are now ready to build. I'll let them work β€” but let me skip ahead to show you the end result." The team proposal alone is a strong demo.
C
If voice-to-text fails: Type the prompt. You've rehearsed it. Keep talking while typing: "I'm describing what I want β€” a content library, automated discovery, quality gates..."

Rehearsal notes

!
Do a full test run tonight. Time each phase. Know how long Squad takes to propose, approve, and start building.
!
Practice the voice prompt 3Γ—. Windows dictation needs clear speech, slight pauses between phrases.
!
The silence while Squad thinks IS the drama. Don't fill it. Let the audience wonder.
!
The pivot line is the most important sentence. Rehearse it cold: "I did exactly this. Six weeks ago. Let me show you where this ends up."
!
File explorer is your visual proof. The audience sees an empty folder become a project. Even if they can't read the file names, the tree growing is the signal.
5/15

Two Weeks Later.

Same command. Same tools. I kept going.

  • 🌐 Live site for a community β€” 10 categories, full-text search
  • πŸ“‘ 14 sources scanned daily β€” AI discovers content overnight
  • πŸ€– Agents research, validate, assign, format, ship
  • πŸ‘₯ Domain experts curate β€” they decide, agents execute
"Built by one person. Who can't code."
15 30 60 ⚑ THE REVEAL · 3 min · Browse live site

I initiated this build two weeks ago. Same empty project. Same conversation. I reviewed, iterated, kept going. Let me show you where it ended up.

[Switch to browser β€” browse aka.ms/agenticlibrary]

A live site for a community. Ten categories, search. Fourteen sources scanned daily β€” AI discovers content overnight. Agents research, validate, assign, format, ship. Domain experts curate β€” they decide, agents execute.

[pause] Built by one person. Who can't code.

6/15

The Dark Factory

Level 7 β€” the horizon

Fully autonomous software β€” systems that build and operate themselves.

We're not there yet.
But look how close levels 5 and 6 already got us.

VΓ₯gar vi?

30 60 🎯 HORIZON · 1 min · Brief, futuristic

Level 7. The Dark Factory. Fully autonomous software β€” systems that build and operate themselves. We're not there yet. But look how close levels 5 and 6 already got us. The path is clear. The question is whether we dare walk it. VΓ₯gar vi?

Act 3 β€” The Shift

5 min
7/15

AI Was a Great Advisor.
Now It Is Also a Great Operator.

  • AI can now reason across complex tasks
  • AI can now use tools β€” MCP, custom skills, extensible toolboxes
  • AI can now self-correct β€” check, iterate, and improve in loops

🧠 Understand β†’ πŸ“‹ Plan β†’ πŸ”§ Act β†’ βœ… Check β†’ πŸ”„ Iterate

Wrapped in: memory Β· guardrails Β· human review

15 30 60 ⚑ THE SPINE · 3 min · This is the WHY

So why is this happening now? One shift. AI crossed a threshold recently. Coding agents became good enough to ship real work. The ripple effects are everywhere.

Three capabilities changed: reasoning across complex tasks, tool use through MCP and custom skills, and self-correction β€” agents that check, iterate, and improve in loops.

The agent loop: understand, plan, act, check, iterate. Wrapped in memory, guardrails, and human review. That's why this is a real system, not a party trick.

8/15

The Building Blocks

Start simple. Add power when you need it.

πŸ’¬ Copilot CLI β€” describe what you want. It plans, acts, checks.
πŸ”Œ + Tools β€” MCP, custom skills, specialist agents, extensible toolboxes.
πŸ‘₯ + Team β€” specialists with expertise, memory, and task lists.
30 60 🎯 LAYERS · 2 min · Three progressive blocks

Three layers. Start with Copilot CLI β€” describe what you want, it plans and executes. Add tools β€” MCP, custom skills, specialist agents, extensible toolboxes. Then add a team β€” specialists with expertise, memory, and task lists. What you saw in the demo? That's all three layers working together.

Act 4 β€” VΓ₯gar Vi?

9 min
9/15

By the Numbers

2
evenings to first version
8
specialist agents
14
sources scanned daily
75+
curated entries
~15
min/day to operate
1
non-developer
30 60 🎯 NUMBERS · 2 min · Build to punchline

Two evenings to the first version. Eight specialist agents. Fourteen sources scanned daily. Seventy-five curated entries. About fifteen minutes a day to operate. And one non-developer. [pause] But I'd be lying if I told you it was all smooth.

10/15

VΓ₯gar Vi?

What happened when I trusted too much

πŸ”₯ Day Three

One agent. Every task. I asked it to add a link. It added the link β€” but also "improved" three existing entries I never asked it to touch. The output looked professional. I approved it. The site broke.

Agent confidence β‰  agent correctness.

15 30 60 ⚑ CREDIBILITY PEAK · 3 min · Tell as one scene

VΓ₯gar vi? Can we trust them? Let me tell you about day three. I had one agent doing everything. I asked it to add a link. It added the link β€” but also 'improved' three existing entries I never asked it to touch. The output looked professional. I approved it. The site broke.

Agent confidence is not agent correctness. That failure taught me: trust is earned, not assumed.

11/15

The Trust Spectrum

Not more control. Not less control. The right control.

πŸ”’ Check Everything

Safe but slow

βœ… Trust but Verify

Humans at judgment points

⚑ Let It Run

Fast but risky

  • Specialist agents β†’ narrow scope, fewer surprises
  • Validation layers β†’ agents check each other
  • Human checkpoints β†’ at the decisions that matter
  • Full audit trail β†’ every action logged, every change reversible
15 30 60 🎯 THE ANSWER · 2 min · Visual scale

The answer isn't 'don't trust them' or 'trust them completely.' It's a spectrum. On one end: check everything. Safe, but slow. On the other: let it run. Fast, autonomous. The sweet spot: trust but verify. Humans at the judgment points.

Four safeguards: specialist agents with narrow scope, validation layers where agents check each other, human checkpoints at the decisions that matter, and a full audit trail.

12/15

The Guardrails That Make It Work

πŸ”’ Security & Governance
  • Human review before production
  • No secrets or sensitive data in prompts
  • Full audit trail Β· scope limits Β· rollback
πŸ€– Responsible AI
  • Agents can be confidently wrong β€” verify
  • Document what's AI-generated
  • Start small, earn trust, expand scope

"Autonomy without guardrails is just chaos with better PR."

30 60 🎯 REASSURANCE · 2 min

Security and governance on one side β€” human review before production, no sensitive data in prompts, full audit trail. Responsible AI on the other β€” agents can be confidently wrong, document what's AI-generated, start small and earn trust. Autonomy without guardrails is just chaos with better PR.

Act 5 β€” The Close

6 min
13/15

What I Learned

  • 1. We're already there. The tools work β€” well enough to build and operate real systems with human oversight.
  • 2. Trust is earned, not assumed. Start small. Let agents prove themselves. Expand scope as confidence grows.
  • 3. The teams that learn to direct agents will move faster. This is becoming a competitive advantage β€” and the window is open now.
15 30 60 ⚑ THREE IDEAS · 2 min

Three things I learned.

One: we're already there. Not someday. Now. The tools work well enough to build and operate real systems.

Two: trust is earned. Start small. Let agents prove themselves. Expand as confidence grows.

Three: the teams that learn to direct agents will move faster. This is becoming a competitive advantage. The window is open now.

14/15

Your Turn

The people who used to be blocked from building
were not blocked by lack of ideas.

They were blocked by access β€” not by ambition.

That access is here now.
VΓ₯gar du?

15 30 60 ⚑ GOOSEBUMPS · 2 min

The people who used to be blocked from building were not blocked by lack of ideas. They were blocked by access β€” not by ambition. That access is here now. VΓ₯gar du?

15/15

Resources

  • 🌐 Everything: bit.ly/agentjohan + QR
  • πŸ”§ Copilot CLI: github.com/features/copilot/cli
  • πŸ‘₯ Squad: github.com/bradygaster/squad
  • πŸŽ“ Free course: developer.microsoft.com/…/get-started-with-github-copilot-cli
  • πŸ‘€ Contact: Johan Wallquist β€” Teams / LinkedIn

AI was a great advisor. Now it is also a great operator.
What will you operate?

15 30 60 🎯 Q&A · Keep on screen

Everything from this talk β€” the presentation itself, links, tools, courses, and how to connect with me β€” all in one place. Scan the QR or visit the link. AI was a great advisor. Now it is also a great operator. What will you operate?

πŸ“‹ Prep Checklist

☐ItemDetails
☐TerminalLarge font, dark theme, empty folder ready
☐Squad CLIInstalled and tested β€” squad init works
☐Tab 1aka.ms/agenticlibrary β€” live site
☐Zoom125%+ for audience display
☐DNDTeams + Outlook notifications off
☐StatsVerify current numbers (entries, agents, sources)
☐FallbackDemo card has fallback plan if live demo fails
☐VoiceWin+H dictation tested and working